Using a Meta-Analysis to Unravel Relative Importance of Postulated Explanations For the Endowment Effect
A meta-analysis, based on hierarchical modeling and bootstrapping, tests the relative explanatory power of drivers of the endowment effect. Results show biased information processing is the leading explanatory account, relative to ownership and misrepresentation. Ownership accounts are not all equal; implicit self-threat (vs. possession-self link) is the more dominant component.
Citation:
Peter Nguyen, Xin (Shane) Wang, and David J. Curry (2018) ,"Using a Meta-Analysis to Unravel Relative Importance of Postulated Explanations For the Endowment Effect", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 86-91.
Authors
Peter Nguyen, Ivey Business School
Xin (Shane) Wang, Western University, Canada
David J. Curry, University of Cincinnati, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
K7. Responses to Online Behavioral Advertising Disclosures: Effects of Disclosure Source Trustworthiness and Message Type on Advertising Outcomes
Iris van Ooijen, University of Twente
Featured
Pretty Healthy Food: How Prettiness Amplifies Perceived Healthiness
Linda Hagen, University of Southern California, USA
Featured
Q10. Social Media Agency: Exploring the Role of Social Media Structures in Shaping Consumers’ Identity Projects
Gabrielle Patry-Beaudoin, Queens University, Canada
Jay Handelman, Queens University, Canada