Using a Meta-Analysis to Unravel Relative Importance of Postulated Explanations For the Endowment Effect
A meta-analysis, based on hierarchical modeling and bootstrapping, tests the relative explanatory power of drivers of the endowment effect. Results show biased information processing is the leading explanatory account, relative to ownership and misrepresentation. Ownership accounts are not all equal; implicit self-threat (vs. possession-self link) is the more dominant component.
Citation:
Peter Nguyen, Xin (Shane) Wang, and David J. Curry (2018) ,"Using a Meta-Analysis to Unravel Relative Importance of Postulated Explanations For the Endowment Effect", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 86-91.
Authors
Peter Nguyen, Ivey Business School
Xin (Shane) Wang, Western University, Canada
David J. Curry, University of Cincinnati, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
N1. The Experiential Advantage in Eudaimonic Well-being – An Experimental Assessment
Aditya Gupta, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
James Gentry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Featured
Cultivating Collaboration and Value Cocreation in Consumption Journeys
Melissa Archpru Akaka, University of Denver
Hope Schau, University of Arizona, USA
Featured
K5. Advertising Organizational Culture as a Selling Tactic for For-Profit Organizations
Dejun Tony Kong, University of Houston, USA
Maria Ng, University of Houston, USA