Using a Meta-Analysis to Unravel Relative Importance of Postulated Explanations For the Endowment Effect
A meta-analysis, based on hierarchical modeling and bootstrapping, tests the relative explanatory power of drivers of the endowment effect. Results show biased information processing is the leading explanatory account, relative to ownership and misrepresentation. Ownership accounts are not all equal; implicit self-threat (vs. possession-self link) is the more dominant component.
Citation:
Peter Nguyen, Xin (Shane) Wang, and David J. Curry (2018) ,"Using a Meta-Analysis to Unravel Relative Importance of Postulated Explanations For the Endowment Effect", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 86-91.
Authors
Peter Nguyen, Ivey Business School
Xin (Shane) Wang, Western University, Canada
David J. Curry, University of Cincinnati, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
N1. The Experiential Advantage in Eudaimonic Well-being – An Experimental Assessment
Aditya Gupta, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
James Gentry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Featured
R1. How Consumers Deal With Brand Failure-An Individual Differences Approach
Melika Kordrostami, California State University-San Bernardino
Elika Kordrostami, Rowan University
Featured
The Ex-Money Effect: When and Why People Feel Connected to Outcomes that Involve Money They Previously Had
Charis Li, University of Florida, USA
Yanping Tu, University of Florida, USA