The Experiential Advantage: a Meta-Analysis
We meta-analyze the experiential advantage literature (Van Boven and Gilovich 2003) comparing material purchases to experiential purchases in 129 studies. While measures of happiness had a “small-to-medium” effect size overall (d = .26), measures of impressions and personal identity had directionally larger effect sizes (d = .45).
Citation:
Evan Weingarten and Joseph K Goodman (2018) ,"The Experiential Advantage: a Meta-Analysis", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 86-91.
Authors
Evan Weingarten, University of California San Diego, USA
Joseph K Goodman, Ohio State University, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Prices in Red: When a Red Price Becomes a Stop Sign
Hongjun Ye, Drexel University, USA
Siddharth Bhatt, Drexel University, USA
Rajneesh Suri, Drexel University, USA
Featured
Cueing Backwards: Attention Processes in Multi-Attribute Choices
Antonia Krefeld-Schwalb, Geneva School of Economics and Management
Agnes Scholz, University of Zurich
Ursa Bernadic, Geneva School of Economics and Management
Benjamin Scheibehenne, Geneva School of Economics and Management
Featured
How Temporal Separation in Budgeting Affects Spending Behavior
Yuna Choe, Texas A&M University, USA
Christina Kan, Texas A&M University, USA