Allocation Between Alternatives: the Role of Tradeoffs

We show that relatively symmetric allocation results from a deliberative decision process where consumers engage in tradeoffs. More tradeoffs result in reduced differences in attributes weights thereby making alternatives appear equally appealing. We thus address the gap in the allocation literature by identifying the process underlying symmetric (and asymmetric) allocation.



Citation:

Nicha Tanskul, Nivriti Chowdhry, and Ajay Kalra (2018) ,"Allocation Between Alternatives: the Role of Tradeoffs", in E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11, eds. Maggie Geuens, Mario Pandelaere, and Michel Tuan Pham, Iris Vermeir, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 247-248.

Authors

Nicha Tanskul, Custom Asia Co. Ltd., Thailand
Nivriti Chowdhry, Rice University, USA
Ajay Kalra, Rice University, USA



Volume

E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

When Less is More - How Making Products More Personal Can Decrease Purchase Intention

Michael Schulz, University of Cologne

Read More

Featured

People Overpredict the Benefit of Using Expensive Items and Appearing Rich in Friend-Making

Xilin Li, University of Chicago, USA
Christopher Hsee, University of Chicago, USA

Read More

Featured

Asymmetry in Susceptibility to Fake News due to Political Orientation

Hyerin Han, University of Minnesota, USA
Ryan Wang, University of Minnesota, USA
Akshay Rao, University of Minnesota, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.