The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Morality and Motivations of Online Shamers
Online shaming entails two contradictory outcomes: informal enforcement against deviant behavior, and violation of privacy rights. A set of studies shows this duality and demonstrates the role of morality in driving participation in online shaming. The results highlight the moderating effect of high (vs. low) identifiability of the wrongdoer.
Citation:
Chen Pundak, Yael Steinhart, and Jacob Goldenberg (2018) ,"The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Morality and Motivations of Online Shamers", in E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11, eds. Maggie Geuens, Mario Pandelaere, and Michel Tuan Pham, Iris Vermeir, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 236-237.
Authors
Chen Pundak, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Yael Steinhart, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Jacob Goldenberg, IDC Herzliya, Israel
Volume
E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
How Employees Relate to Their Brand Online: A Critical Visual Analysis of Hollister
Stephanie Kogler, University of Innsbruck, Austria
Featured
From Novice to Know-it-All: How Google-Based Financial Learning Affects Financial Confidence and Decisions
Adrian Ward, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Tito L. H. Grillo, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Philip M. Fernbach, University of Colorado, USA
Featured
More Than Meets the Eye: The Influence of Tableware Aesthetics on Food Consumption
Chi Pham, UNSW Sydney
Nitika Garg, University of New South Wales