The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Morality and Motivations of Online Shamers
Online shaming entails two contradictory outcomes: informal enforcement against deviant behavior, and violation of privacy rights. A set of studies shows this duality and demonstrates the role of morality in driving participation in online shaming. The results highlight the moderating effect of high (vs. low) identifiability of the wrongdoer.
Citation:
Chen Pundak, Yael Steinhart, and Jacob Goldenberg (2018) ,"The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Morality and Motivations of Online Shamers", in E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11, eds. Maggie Geuens, Mario Pandelaere, and Michel Tuan Pham, Iris Vermeir, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 236-237.
Authors
Chen Pundak, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Yael Steinhart, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Jacob Goldenberg, IDC Herzliya, Israel
Volume
E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Morality Matters in the Marketplace: The Influence of Morally Based Attitudes on Consumer Purchase Intentions
Andrew Luttrell, Ball State University
Jacob Teeny, Ohio State University, USA
Richard Petty, Ohio State University, USA
Featured
Consumers' Journey into Access-Based Consumption
Swapnil Saravade, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
Lorena Garcia Ramon, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
Jacob Almaguer, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
Mohammadali Zolfagharian, Bowling Green State University
Hazel H. Dadanlar, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
Featured
The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Conflicts and Motivations of Online Shamers
Chen Pundak, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Yael Steinhart, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Jacob Goldenberg, IDC