Paradoxes in Reward-Based Crowdfunding

Reward-based crowdfunding creates a contradiction-laden context where paradoxical tensions occur. We apply the concept of paradox to analyze the funders-founder relation in this context. We expand on research on hybrid business models by studying a context where consumers buy into products when they still are ideas.



Citation:

Natalia Drozdova and Ingeborg Astrid Kleppe (2017) ,"Paradoxes in Reward-Based Crowdfunding ", in LA - Latin American Advances in Consumer Research Volume 4, eds. Enrique P. Becerra, Ravindra Chitturi, and Maria Cecilia Henriquez Daza and Juan Carlos Londoño Roldan, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 64-64.

Authors

Natalia Drozdova, Norwegian School of Economics, Norway
Ingeborg Astrid Kleppe, Norwegian School of Economics, Norway



Volume

LA - Latin American Advances in Consumer Research Volume 4 | 2017



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Using a Meta-Analysis to Unravel Relative Importance of Postulated Explanations for the Endowment Effect

Peter Nguyen, Ivey Business School
Xin (Shane) Wang, Western University, Canada
David J. Curry, University of Cincinnati, USA

Read More

Featured

Understanding Organ Donation: Discourses of Embodied Recycling

Rebecca Scott, Cardiff University
Samantha Warren, Car

Read More

Featured

B2. The Prevention Oriented Chameleon: Mimicry in a Prevention Orientation Leads to More Brand Trust

Judith Willberger, Technical University of Munich
Gavan Fitzsimons, Duke University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.