The Ratings Paradox: Why We Prefer Reading Negative Reviews, But Then Subsequently Rate These Reviews As Less Useful
Negative reviews are read more than, but rated as less useful than, positive reviews. We explain this paradox as follows. First, consumers desire negative information about a preferred option. Second, consumers bias information to read as “neutral”, and then rate the review as less useful because of lack of diagnosticity.
Kurt Carlson, Abhijit Guha, and Ryan Michael Daniels (2011) ,"The Ratings Paradox: Why We Prefer Reading Negative Reviews, But Then Subsequently Rate These Reviews As Less Useful", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38, eds. Darren W. Dahl, Gita V. Johar, and Stijn M.J. van Osselaer, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research.
Kurt Carlson, Georgetown University, USA
Abhijit Guha, Wayne State University, USA
Ryan Michael Daniels, Enter affiliation ...
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38 | 2011
Speaking ill of Others: When Negatively-Valenced Gossip Fosters Social Connection
Alixandra Barasch, New York University, USA
Jonathan Zev Berman, London Business School, UK
Heeyoung Yoon, New York University, USA
M12. From the Occult to Mainstream – Tracing Commodification of the Spiritual in the Context of Alternative Spiritualities
Richard Kedzior, Bucknell University
When Taking Action Means Accepting Responsibility: Omission Bias Predicts Reluctance to Vaccinate Due to Greater Anticipated Culpability for Negative Side Effects
Gary Sherman, Stony Brook University
Stacey R Finkelstein, Stony Brook University
Beth Vallen, Vilanova University, USA
Paul M Connell, Stony Brook University
Kristen Feemster, Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, USA