The Middle Option Bias: Is the Compromise Effect Driven By a Response Order Effect

Studies of compromise effect typically confound an option's serial position with its position in attribute space (i.e. the "medium" priced option is presented second). When these two effects are separated, we find that occupancy of the middle position is often more important than possession of average attribute values.



Citation:

Daniel Mochon and Shane Frederick (2011) ,"The Middle Option Bias: Is the Compromise Effect Driven By a Response Order Effect", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38, eds. Darren W. Dahl, Gita V. Johar, and Stijn M.J. van Osselaer, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research.

Authors

Daniel Mochon , Yale University, USA
Shane Frederick, Yale University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38 | 2011



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

R1. How Consumers Deal With Brand Failure-An Individual Differences Approach

Melika Kordrostami, California State University-San Bernardino
Elika Kordrostami, Rowan University

Read More

Featured

O1. Choice, Rejection, and Context Effects

Shih-Chieh Chuang, National Chung Cheng University
Yin-Hui Cheng, National Taichung University of Education

Read More

Featured

When Novices have more Influence than Experts: Empirical Evidence from Online Peer Reviews

Peter Nguyen, Ivey Business School
Xin (Shane) Wang, Western University, Canada
Xi Li, City University of Hong Kong
June Cotte, Ivey Business School

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.