Are Inconsistent Csr Associations Always Detrimental? the Influence of Dialectic Thinking on Brand Perceptions

Some brands are simultaneously associated with a strong and a poor CSR record. We propose that dialectic thinkers are likely to respond more favorably to inconsistent CSR brands than non-dialectic thinkers. The public (vs. private) nature of the decision and the reactive (vs. proactive) CSR strategy employed moderate this effect.



Citation:

Alokparna (Sonia) Monga, Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, and Vanitha Swaminathan (2011) ,"Are Inconsistent Csr Associations Always Detrimental? the Influence of Dialectic Thinking on Brand Perceptions", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38, eds. Darren W. Dahl, Gita V. Johar, and Stijn M.J. van Osselaer, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research.

Authors

Alokparna (Sonia) Monga, University of South Carolina, USA
Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Koç University, Turkey
Vanitha Swaminathan, University of Pittsburgh, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38 | 2011



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Explaining the Attraction Effect: An Ambiguity-Attention-Applicability Framework

Sharlene He, Concordia University, Canada
Brian Sternthal, Northwestern University, USA

Read More

Featured

Conflicting Institutional Logics and Eldercare Consumers’ Coping Strategies in Asymmetrical Service Relationships

Ankita Kumar, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA

Read More

Featured

P11. A Price Premium on A Trivial but Weak Preferred Attribute Increase Choice: The Roles of Scarcity, Arousal and Perceived Risk

Yueyan Wu, Hunan University, China
Chunyan Xie, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
Zhi Yang, Hunan University, China
Luluo Peng, Hunan University, China

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.