When Is It Better to Be Bad? Schema-Congruency Effects in Moral Evaluations of Products

This paper investigates the effects of a product’s moral history on consumer preferences. Although people generally prefer products associated with moral individuals, when the same product is framed in a vice context (i.e., for partying), participants are more likely to purchase products invented by an immoral (versus moral) person.



Citation:

Jennifer S. Danilowitz and George E. Newman (2011) ,"When Is It Better to Be Bad? Schema-Congruency Effects in Moral Evaluations of Products", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38, eds. Darren W. Dahl, Gita V. Johar, and Stijn M.J. van Osselaer, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research.

Authors

Jennifer S. Danilowitz, Yale University, USA
George E. Newman, Yale University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38 | 2011



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Motion, Emotion, and Indulgence: How Movement Influences Consumption

Yegyu Han, Virginia Tech, USA
Rajesh Bagchi, Virginia Tech, USA
Syagnik Banerjee, University of Michigan at Flint

Read More

Featured

J15. The Deliberation Effect on the Judgment and Choice of Anthropomorphized Products

Juliana M. Batista, EAESP Fundação Getúlio Vargas
Jose Mauro C. Hernandez, Centro Universitário FEI

Read More

Featured

Understanding Consumer Sensory Preferences: An Ethnographic Investigation of Sensory Flamboyance and Subtlety in India

Tanuka Ghoshal, Baruch College, USA
Russell W. Belk, York University, Canada

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.