Consumers Do Compare Apples With Oranges: Investigating Cross Catetory Referencing in Consumer Decision-Making

This research demonstrates that consumers often refer to an unrelated (cross-category) product as a reference to make a current purchase decision. We present a theory of “motivated anchoring” to understand (1) when consumers rely on cross-category referencing, (2) its impact on consumer decision-making, and, 3) the mechanism underlying its operation.



Citation:

Vanessa Patrick and Weixing Ma (2011) ,"Consumers Do Compare Apples With Oranges: Investigating Cross Catetory Referencing in Consumer Decision-Making", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38, eds. Darren W. Dahl, Gita V. Johar, and Stijn M.J. van Osselaer, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research.

Authors

Vanessa Patrick, University of Houston, USA
Weixing Ma, University of Houston, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38 | 2011



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

F9. Protection against Deception: The Moderating Effects of Knowledge Calibration on Consumer Responses to Ambiguous Advertisement Information

Joel Alan Mohr, Queens University, Canada
Peter A. Dacin, Queens University, Canada

Read More

Featured

The Impact of Childhood Exposure to Interparental Conflict on Consumer Response to Online Reviews

Mengmeng Liu, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
Maureen Morrin, Temple University, USA
Boyoun Grace Chae, Temple University, USA

Read More

Featured

Rituals Enhance Self-Brand Connection: The Role of Time Perception

Maggie Wenjing Liu, Tsinghua University
Xian Wang, Tsinghua University
Qichao Zhu, Tsinghua University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.