The Effect of Schadenfreude on Choice of Conventional Versus Unconventional Options

We examine the relationship between schadenfreude and choice of conventional versus unconventional options. Our results show that consumers are relatively more likely to choose conventional, compromise or safe options when experiencing incidental schadenfreude, in comparison to happiness and to sadness. This effect appears to be driven by consumers’ interpretation of schadenfreude as information regarding which option they should choose.



Citation:

Thomas Kramer, Ozge Yucel-Aybat, and Loraine Lau-Gesk (2011) ,"The Effect of Schadenfreude on Choice of Conventional Versus Unconventional Options", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38, eds. Darren W. Dahl, Gita V. Johar, and Stijn M.J. van Osselaer, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research.

Authors

Thomas Kramer, Baruch College, USA
Ozge Yucel-Aybat, Baruch College, USA
Loraine Lau-Gesk, University of California, Irvine, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38 | 2011



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Prices in Red: When a Red Price Becomes a Stop Sign

Hongjun Ye, Drexel University, USA
Siddharth Bhatt, Drexel University, USA
Rajneesh Suri, Drexel University, USA

Read More

Featured

Trading Crypto Currency: The Ideological Shaping of Consumer Financial Decision Making

Burcak Ertimur, Fairleigh Dickinson University
Ela Veresiu, York University, Canada
Markus Giesler, York University, Canada

Read More

Featured

How Framing Donor Match as Collaboration Impacts Donation: The Importance of In-Context Field Experiments In Fundraising

Indranil Goswami, SUNY Buffalo
Oleg Urminsky, University of Chicago, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.