The Fundamental Attribution Error in Salespeople and Its Correction By Stealing Thunder: Evidence From Agents and Consumers

The fundamental attribution error in retailing settings is investigated by comparing consumers versus sales agents’ responses to social influence. Two studies investigate how ingratiation tactics and processing motivations influence the error. Results demonstrate that under defense motivations, consumers are less likely to fall prey to the error than agents.



Citation:

Wenxia Guo and Kelley Main (2011) ,"The Fundamental Attribution Error in Salespeople and Its Correction By Stealing Thunder: Evidence From Agents and Consumers", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38, eds. Darren W. Dahl, Gita V. Johar, and Stijn M.J. van Osselaer, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research.

Authors

Wenxia Guo, University of Manitoba, Canada
Kelley Main, University of Manitoba, Canada



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38 | 2011



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

J4. A Large Pack of Toilet Paper is Bad for Me: Self-control and Consumers’ Responses to Product Quantity

(Joyce) Jingshi Liu, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Keith Wilcox, Columbia University, USA
Amy Dalton, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Read More

Featured

R11. The Influence of Brand Rituals on Perceived Brand Authenticity

Lijing Zheng, University of Hong Kong
Echo Wen Wan, University of Hong Kong
Zhongqiang (Tak) Huang, University of Hong Kong

Read More

Featured

The Asymmetric Effect of Highlighting Intertemporal Opportunity Costs

Christopher Olivola, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
David Hardisty, University of British Columbia, Canada
Daniel Read, University of Warwick

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.