Source 2.0: Reading Source Cues in Online Communities

Consumer research literature on source cues has been focused on individual responses to credibility and attractiveness. Using netnography, we suggest the importance of consumers’ reading of dynamic and multiple cultural codes through theoretical insights on how online members in virtual communities interpret and negotiate source cues.



Citation:

Catherine Coleman and Marie-Agnès Parmentier (2011) ,"Source 2.0: Reading Source Cues in Online Communities", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38, eds. Darren W. Dahl, Gita V. Johar, and Stijn M.J. van Osselaer, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research.

Authors

Catherine Coleman, Texas Christian University, USA
Marie-Agnès Parmentier, HEC Montreal, Canada



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38 | 2011



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

F8. Dual Routes for Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Positive Moral Emotions, Attitudes, and Empathy

Chunyan Xie, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
Richard P. Bagozzi, University of Michigan, USA

Read More

Featured

I6. How Does Runner’s World Shape a Runner’s World? Understanding Representations of the “Ideal” Female Body in Fitness Advertising

Carly Drake, University of Calgary, Canada
Scott Radford, University of Calgary, Canada

Read More

Featured

When Zero Prices Backfire: A Dual-Process Model for Understanding Consumers’ Reactions to Zero Prices

Fengyan Cai, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Xiaomeng Fan, Northwestern University, USA
Galen V. Bodenhausen, Northwestern University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.