When It Happened Tells Us What Happened: the Effects of Temporal Distance and Metacognitive Inference on Word-Of-Mouth

Inferences from WOM information are influenced by metacognitive assumptions, including the assumption that extreme events are better remembered. Consumers read WOM accounts about a negative restaurant experience that happened one year or one week ago. They inferred that the experience was worse (experiment 1) and reported lower intentions to visit the restaurant (experiment 3), when the recalled event was temporally distant rather than recent, despite understanding that recent events are more predictive of current service quality than distant ones (experiment 2). We conclude that consumers draw on others’ memory performance as a source of information and discuss implications for WOM.



Citation:

Robert Smith and Norbert Schwarz (2010) ,"When It Happened Tells Us What Happened: the Effects of Temporal Distance and Metacognitive Inference on Word-Of-Mouth", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 37, eds. Margaret C. Campbell, Jeff Inman, and Rik Pieters, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 227-231 .

Authors

Robert Smith, University of Michigan, USA
Norbert Schwarz, University of Michigan, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 37 | 2010



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

N13. Smaller Self but Larger Tips? The Effect of Awe on Consumers’ Tipping Intention

Ran Li, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China

Read More

Featured

Product Retention (vs. Acquisition) Choices and Preference for Person-Related Features

Liad Weiss, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA

Read More

Featured

O12. When do People Waste Time? Testing a Mechanism for Parkinson’s Law.

Holly S Howe, Duke University, USA
Tanya Chartrand, Duke University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.