The Persuasive Power of Regulatory Nonfit

A wealth of research has shown that people are more persuaded by appeals that fit their regulatory focus than those that do not. This research provides the first evidence that nonfit appeals may be more persuasive than fit appeals, but only when people are motivated and able to process nonfit information. Specifically, we find that nonfit appeals are more persuasive under high-involvement conditions, whereas fit appeals are more persuasive under low-involvement conditions (Experiment 1). Further, we find that the nonfit effect on persuasion is the result of heightened processing engagement (Experiments 2 and 3), whereby people are more discerning of argument strength (Experiment 3).


Lora Harding, Monika Lisjak, and Angela Lee (2010) ,"The Persuasive Power of Regulatory Nonfit", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 37, eds. Margaret C. Campbell, Jeff Inman, and Rik Pieters, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 455-456 .


Lora Harding, Northwestern University, USA
Monika Lisjak, Northwestern University, USA
Angela Lee, Northwestern University, USA


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 37 | 2010

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


R1. How Consumers Deal With Brand Failure-An Individual Differences Approach

Melika Kordrostami, California State University-San Bernardino
Elika Kordrostami, Rowan University

Read More


Easy To Be Selfish: Comparing the Influence of a Social Norm and an Individual Example

Zheshuai Yang, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Yan Zhang, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Read More


Born to Shop? A Genetic Component of Deal Proneness

Robert M Schindler, Rutgers University, USA
Vishal Lala, Pace University
Jeanette Taylor, Florida State University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.