Word-Of-Mouth Communication As Helping Behavior

Word-of-mouth (WOM) communication has been characterized as a decision, involving weighing of costs and benefits (Gatignon and Robertson 1986). This research develops a cost-benefit framework to systematically test individual differences in altruism, or the internal motivation to help others, as an underlying driver of WOM. In three studies, benefits of information (e.g., diagnostic value) and/or communicator costs (either resource or social costs) of information-sharing are manipulated. Findings indicate that, high altruists’ WOM behavior is driven by the perceived diagnostic value of information, whereas low altruists’ WOM behavior is driven by perceived communicator costs.



Citation:

Andrew Kaikati and Rohini Ahluwalia (2010) ,"Word-Of-Mouth Communication As Helping Behavior", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 37, eds. Margaret C. Campbell, Jeff Inman, and Rik Pieters, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 126-129 .

Authors

Andrew Kaikati, University of Minnesota, USA
Rohini Ahluwalia, University of Minnesota, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 37 | 2010



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Q3. Academic Branding on Social Media: Examining the Influence of Personal Brands on the Professor-Student Relationships

Edita Petrylaite, Northumbria University, UK
Darija Aleksic, University of Ljubljana

Read More

Featured

I9. From Childhood Toys to Grownup Choices: Understanding the Gendered Appeal of Violent Media

Martin A. Pyle, Ryerson University

Read More

Featured

Conducting Consumer-Relevant Research

Jeffrey Inman, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Margaret C. Campbell, University of Colorado, USA
Amna Kirmani, University of Maryland, USA
Linda L Price, University of Oregon, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.