Non-Conscious Processing and Choice in Context

Prior research has demonstrated that non-conscious processing can improve one’s decisions (as compared to conscious elaboration) (Dijksterhuis et al. 2006). This research tests how one’s style of processing (non-conscious vs. conscious) affects one’s propensity to demonstrate a classic context effect in choice: the compromise effect (Simonson 1989). We demonstrate that participants who engaged in non-conscious processing prior to choice were less likely to demonstrate the compromise effect than participants who consciously elaborated on their options. Further we show that these results cannot be explained by mere distraction prior to choice.



Citation:

Kelly Goldsmith, Ap Dijksterhuis, and Ravi Dhar (2010) ,"Non-Conscious Processing and Choice in Context", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 37, eds. Margaret C. Campbell, Jeff Inman, and Rik Pieters, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 153-156 .

Authors

Kelly Goldsmith, Northwestern University, USA
Ap Dijksterhuis, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Ravi Dhar, Yale Univeristy, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 37 | 2010



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

I1. Blaming Him or Them? A Study on Attribution Behavior

Chun Zhang, University of Dayton
Michel Laroche, Concordia University, Canada
Yaoqi Li, Sun Yat-Sen University, China

Read More

Featured

M12. From the Occult to Mainstream – Tracing Commodification of the Spiritual in the Context of Alternative Spiritualities

Richard Kedzior, Bucknell University

Read More

Featured

Conflicting Institutional Logics and Eldercare Consumers’ Coping Strategies in Asymmetrical Service Relationships

Ankita Kumar, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.