Motivation and Capacity in the Selection of Comparison Standards

Gains may be valued by comparing them with alternatives that are present at the time of comparison or with alternatives that are absent. We offer a two-stage model in which people initially make "present comparisons," and subsequently make "absent comparisons" when they have sufficient cognitive resources and motivation. People who won the greater of two amounts were equally happy when they won $5 as when they won $3; but people who won the lesser of two amounts were happier with $5 than with $3. The latter effect disappeared when cognitive load prevented people from making absent comparisons.


Karim Kassam, Carey Morewedge, and Daniel Gilbert (2010) ,"Motivation and Capacity in the Selection of Comparison Standards", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 37, eds. Margaret C. Campbell, Jeff Inman, and Rik Pieters, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 215-218 .


Karim Kassam, Harvard University, USA
Carey Morewedge, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Daniel Gilbert, Harvard University, USA


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 37 | 2010

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


Consuming Commodified Selves – Accelerated Identity Co-Construction Dynamics Through Fashion Performances on Instagram

Jonathan David Schöps, University of Innsbruck, Austria

Read More


K8. Framing Matters. How Comparisons to Ideal and Anti-Ideal Reference Points Affect Brand Evaluations.

Magdalena Zyta Jablonska, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Andrzej Falkowski, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities

Read More


Exploring Consumers’ Technology Dreams and Nightmares: A Collage-Elicitation Study

Céline Del Bucchia, Audencia Business School
Cristel Russell, American University, USA
Burlat Claire, Audencia Business School

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.