Ironic Effects of Goal Activation on Choice

Consumers hold multiple goals, some of which may conflict. This project explores how choices in the service of one goal (e.g., indulgence) are impacted when a conflicting goal (e.g., health) is incidentally activated prior to the decision. Our work reveals that consumers experiencing such goal conflict become more likely to choose options that are easier to justify. This can lead to ironic results when the option that is easier to justify poses greater conflict to the incidentally activated goal. A series of studies support this proposed process, demonstrating boundary conditions and moderators.



Citation:

Kelly Goldsmith and Ravi Dhar (2010) ,"Ironic Effects of Goal Activation on Choice", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 37, eds. Margaret C. Campbell, Jeff Inman, and Rik Pieters, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 259-262 .

Authors

Kelly Goldsmith, Northwestern University, USA
Ravi Dhar, Yale University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 37 | 2010



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

How Passive Form Messages in CSR Advertisement Improve Consumer Reaction to the Campaign

Taehoon Park, University of South Carolina, USA
Anastasiya Pocheptsova Ghosh, University of Arizona, USA
Elise Chandon Ince, University of South Carolina, USA

Read More

Featured

Green Experiences: Using Green Products Improves the Accompanying Consumption Experience

Ali Tezer, HEC Montreal, Canada
H. Onur Bodur, Concordia University, Canada

Read More

Featured

Moral Arguments Are Most Persuasive in Changing Attitudes of Opponents of Genetically Modified Foods

Sydney Scott, Washington University, USA
Yoel Inbar, University of Toronto, Canada
Paul Rozin, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.