Ambiguity Aversion and the Power of Established Brands

This paper investigates situations in which a sizeable subset of consumers prefers an established brand featuring inferior attributes to a less-established brand featuring superior attributes. Established brands are those for which consumers hold more confident beliefs about the benefits (although their specific attributes might be worse than those of competing, less-established brand). We propose that ambiguity aversion, as proposed in the literature on decision making under uncertainty drives the preference for a “dominated” established brand. In nine experiments, we examine the role of ambiguity aversion in the preference for a dominated, established brand. We first show that there is a correlation between ambiguity aversion (revealed through choices among monetary gambles) and the preference for established brands. We then show that the preference for established brands is enhanced when ambiguity aversion is made more salient in unrelated preceding choices. To further study the ambiguity-reducing properties of established brands, the last two experiments assign brand names to monetary gambles, and established brands appear to increase the likelihood of choosing ambiguous gambles. Overall, this research suggests that consumers’ tendency of ambiguity aversion may at least partly drive preference for dominated, established brands and thus indirectly help their brand equity.



Citation:

A. V. Muthukrishnan, Luc Wathieu, and Alison Jing Xu (2009) ,"Ambiguity Aversion and the Power of Established Brands", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 8, eds. Sridhar Samu, Rajiv Vaidyanathan, and Dipankar Chakravarti, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 341-341.

Authors

A. V. Muthukrishnan, HKUST, Hong Kong, SAR
Luc Wathieu, ESMT, Berlin, Germany
Alison Jing Xu, HKUST, Hong Kong SAR



Volume

AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 8 | 2009



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Perspectives on “What Can We Trust? Perceptions of, and Responses to, Fake Information” and the Changing Values of Information

Kristen Lane, University of Arizona, USA
Merrie Brucks, University of Arizona, USA

Read More

Featured

Emotion, Scientific Reasoning, and Judgments of Scientific Evidence

Caitlin Drummond, University of Michigan, USA
Baruch Fischhoff, Carnegie Mellon University, USA

Read More

Featured

Consumer Responses to Premium Framing: Better to Offer the Target Product as a Free Gift?

Maggie Wenjing Liu, Tsinghua University
Lu Yang, Tsinghua University
Yuhuang Zheng, Tsinghua University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.