Arranged to Distraction: How Categorizing Products With Complements Versus Substitutes Alters the Experience of Product Choice
Although much is known about how substitute products impact consumers’ decision processes, little is known about how product displays involving complementary items affect decisions. If consumers shop for a single target product, complementary items are objectively irrelevant. Yet, our research finds that organizing products with complements distracts consumers, increasing decision time and perceived effort. This distraction occurs across different physical arrangements and is not due to detailed examination of complementary products. At the same time, complementary categorizations are perceived as attractive and inviting, suggesting that their negative effects may be offset by creating an engaging, affectively positive experience.
Erica van Herpen, Kristin Diehl, and Cait Poynor (2009) ,"Arranged to Distraction: How Categorizing Products With Complements Versus Substitutes Alters the Experience of Product Choice", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 8, eds. Sridhar Samu, Rajiv Vaidyanathan, and Dipankar Chakravarti, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 243-246.
Erica van Herpen, Wageningen University, The Netherlands
Kristin Diehl, University of Southern California, U.S.A.
Cait Poynor, University of Pittsburgh, U.S.A.
AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 8 | 2009
Featured papersSee More
What a Waste: Effects of Food Consumption Choices and Traffic Light Labelling on Disposal
Marit Drijfhout, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Jenny van Doorn, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Koert van Ittersum, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Consumers’ Trust in Algorithms
Noah Castelo, Columbia University, USA
Maarten Bos, Disney Research
Donald Lehmann, Columbia University, USA
More than just a number: The negative effect of 100% claims
Nira Munichor, Bar-Ilan University
Liat Levontin, Technion University, Israel