Examining Between Group Differences in Consumer Research: Are We Identifying False Positives and False Negatives?
In this paper we discuss why researchers need to establish invariance of survey measures in comparative research studies. Two types of invariance are discussed. With the use of contrived data, we then show why failure to establish measurement invariance can lead to misleading conclusions in between-group consumer research studies. The implications of the study’s results are then discussed.
Subhash Sharma and Srinivas Durvasula (2009) ,"Examining Between Group Differences in Consumer Research: Are We Identifying False Positives and False Negatives?", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 8, eds. Sridhar Samu, Rajiv Vaidyanathan, and Dipankar Chakravarti, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 369-369.
Subhash Sharma, Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, USA
Srinivas Durvasula, Marquette University, USA
AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 8 | 2009
Pursue Your Passions: Cultural Discourses about Consumer’s Heroic Wilderness Adventures
Nathan Warren, University of Oregon, USA
Linda L Price, University of Oregon, USA
Self-Deprecation Signals Humility, but Not as Much as Self-Deprecators Assume
Clayton R Critcher, University of California Berkeley, USA
Michael O'Donnell, University of California Berkeley, USA
Minah Jung, New York University, USA
J1. The Effect of Identity Abstractness on Information Processing Styles
Woojin Choi, University of Seoul
Min Jung Kim, Manhattan College
HyukJin Kwon, University of Seoul
Jiyun Kang, Texas State University