Getting What They Deserve: the Role of Fairness in Schadenfreude From Another’S Product Failure
This paper examines the roles of fairness and psychological closeness to a target on the experience of schadenfreude – taking pleasure in the suffering of another. In a consumption-related context, we examined consumers’ emotional reaction to the downfall of another’s product. Prior research has focused on the link between envy and schadenfreude and on the perceived deservingness of the misfortune. In contrast to this work, we focus on the perceived deservingness or fairness of the initial product ownership. Our findings suggest that schadenfreude can stem from both the removal (via product downfall) of an unfair situation as well as the removal of a product that inspires envy. Unexpectedly, psychologically closeness to the product owner did not enhance schadenfreude, perhaps due to an increase in conflicting emotions.
Ethan Pancer and Laurence Ashworth (2009) ,"Getting What They Deserve: the Role of Fairness in Schadenfreude From Another’S Product Failure", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 8, eds. Sridhar Samu, Rajiv Vaidyanathan, and Dipankar Chakravarti, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 2-3.
Ethan Pancer, Queen's School of Business, Canada
Laurence Ashworth, Queen's School of Business, Canada
AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 8 | 2009
Do You Trust the System? Interaction Effect between Perceived Economic Mobility and Socioeconomic Status on Fair Market Ideology and Consumer Responses
Chun-Ming Yang, Ming Chuan University, Taiwan
Chia-Chi Chang, National Chiao Tung University
Consumers’ Implicit Mindsets and Responses to Cause-related Marketing Campaigns
Meng-Hua Hsieh, Kent State University, USA
Ozge Yucel-Aybat, Pennsylvania State University Harrisburg
Decisional Conflict Predicts Myopia
Paul Edgar Stillman, Ohio State University, USA
Melissa Ferguson, Cornell University, USA