When Does Being Good Imply Doing Good? : Exploring Context Effects on Corporate Social Responsibility
This research explores the double-edged nature of CSR (corporate social responsibility) reputation. Using the inclusion/exclusion model of context effects, we suggest that when CSR reputation is used to interpret company action, assimilation effect results and an ambiguous action to deal with crisis will be judged positively for a company with a positive CSR reputation. However, when CSR reputation is used to form the standard the focal company is held to, contrast effect results and an ambiguous action will be judged negatively for a company with a positive CSR reputation. The presence or absence of information on competitor actions influences which context effect, assimilation or contrast, will occur. Two experiments provide support for our hypotheses.
Shuili Du and Sucharita Chandran (2009) ,"When Does Being Good Imply Doing Good? : Exploring Context Effects on Corporate Social Responsibility", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 8, eds. Sridhar Samu, Rajiv Vaidyanathan, and Dipankar Chakravarti, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 67-67.
Shuili Du, Simmons College, School of Management, Boston, Massachusetts , USA
Sucharita Chandran, School of Management, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts , USA
AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 8 | 2009
Shopping for Freedom: Moroccan Women's Experience in Supermarkets
Delphine Godefroit-Winkel, Toulouse Business School, Casablanca Campus
lisa penaloza, Kedge Business School
Sammy Kwaku Bonsu, Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration
Assuming Ordinality: Best-to-Worst Inferences in Vertical Lists
Mathew S. Isaac, Seattle University
SHAILENDRA PRATAP JAIN, University of Washington, USA
A Slack-Based Account of Pain of Payment
Justin Pomerance, University of Colorado, USA
Nicholas Reinholtz, University of Colorado, USA