When Does Being Good Imply Doing Good? : Exploring Context Effects on Corporate Social Responsibility
This research explores the double-edged nature of CSR (corporate social responsibility) reputation. Using the inclusion/exclusion model of context effects, we suggest that when CSR reputation is used to interpret company action, assimilation effect results and an ambiguous action to deal with crisis will be judged positively for a company with a positive CSR reputation. However, when CSR reputation is used to form the standard the focal company is held to, contrast effect results and an ambiguous action will be judged negatively for a company with a positive CSR reputation. The presence or absence of information on competitor actions influences which context effect, assimilation or contrast, will occur. Two experiments provide support for our hypotheses.
Shuili Du and Sucharita Chandran (2009) ,"When Does Being Good Imply Doing Good? : Exploring Context Effects on Corporate Social Responsibility", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 8, eds. Sridhar Samu, Rajiv Vaidyanathan, and Dipankar Chakravarti, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 67-67.
Shuili Du, Simmons College, School of Management, Boston, Massachusetts , USA
Sucharita Chandran, School of Management, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts , USA
AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 8 | 2009
G3. Warm or Cold? The Effect of Color Temperature of Logo on Evaluation of For-Profits and Nonprofits
Eunmi Jeon, Sungkyunkwan University
Myungwoo Nam, Sungkyunkwan University
D12. Future Decisions and Temporal Contiguity Cues: When Absence of Temporal Contiguity Cues Increases Online Reviews’ Persuasiveness.
Francesco Zanibellato, Ca' Foscari University, Venice, Italy
Using multi-methods in behavioral pricing research
Haipeng Chen, University of Kentucky, USA
David Hardesty, University of Kentucky, USA
Akshay Rao, University of Minnesota, USA
Lisa Bolton, Pennsylvania State University, USA