Inferred Informational Cascades and Their Effects on Choice: the Relative Stocking Level Effect

We present evidence that consumers use the relative stocking level of available alternatives to infer the popularity of those alternatives and then use the inferred popularity as an input in making choices. We suggest that even though consumers do not directly observe the behavior(s) of their predecessors, they use this information to direct their own actions; a process we call an inferred informational cascade. The relative-stocking-level effect is found to be robust in the presence of brand and quality information and also occurs in contexts which might elicit extremeness aversion.



Citation:

Donald Lehmann and Jeffrey Parker (2009) ,"Inferred Informational Cascades and Their Effects on Choice: the Relative Stocking Level Effect", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36, eds. Ann L. McGill and Sharon Shavitt, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 646-646.

Authors

Donald Lehmann, Columbia University, USA
Jeffrey Parker, Columbia University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36 | 2009



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

What a Waste: Effects of Food Consumption Choices and Traffic Light Labelling on Disposal

Marit Drijfhout, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Jenny van Doorn, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Koert van Ittersum, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Read More

Featured

Placing Identity into the Self-Concept: The Role of Causal Beliefs in Identity-Based Consumption

Stephanie Chen, London Business School, UK
Oleg Urminsky, University of Chicago, USA

Read More

Featured

Di$tance

Evan Polman, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Sam J. Maglio, University of Toronto Scarborough

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.