Consumers’ Response to Advocacy Advertising: a Process Model of Consumer Skepticism, Empathic Response, and Prosocial Behavior
In order to be effective, advocacy advertising relies on establishing an emotional connection with consumers. Two studies examine an empathic hierarchy and subsequent coping responses. In study 1, blame (people vs. oil company) and self-blame (moderate vs. high) were manipulated to elicit empathic responses. Appeal type (emotional vs. cognitive) and peer advocacy (single vs. group) were manipulated in study 2. Results indicate that consumer skepticism (i.e., ad credibility, inferred manipulative intent) predicts empathic response (i.e., sympathy, empathy) which, in turn, impacts empathic emotions (anger, guilt, worry, hope). Each emotion predicted active coping aimed at alleviating the aversive situation.
Citation:
Robert Madrigal, Johnny Chen, Monica LaBarge, and Namika Sagara (2009) ,"Consumers’ Response to Advocacy Advertising: a Process Model of Consumer Skepticism, Empathic Response, and Prosocial Behavior", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36, eds. Ann L. McGill and Sharon Shavitt, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 731-732.
Authors
Robert Madrigal, University of Oregon, USA
Johnny Chen, University of Oregon, USA
Monica LaBarge, University of Montana, USA
Namika Sagara, University of Oregon, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36 | 2009
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
R5. Autonomy or Enjoyment? The Contingent Nature of Brand Ritual
Yaxuan Ran, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
Echo Wen Wan, University of Hong Kong
Featured
Consumers’ Attitudes Towards Their Rights and Responsibilities in the Sharing Economy: An Ideological Perspective
Marylouise Caldwell, University of Sydney, Australia
Steve Elliot, University of Sydney, Australia
Paul Henry, University of Sydney, Australia
Marcus O'Connor, University of Sydney, Australia
Featured
The Impact of Previews on the Enjoyment of Multicomponent Multimedia Experiences
Jayson S. Jia, University of Hong Kong
Baba Shiv, Stanford University, USA