Consumers Commit the Planning Fallacy For Time But Not For Money

Individuals consistently believe that their optimistically biased predictions of project durations are accurate, while simultaneously acknowledging their tendency to make biased predictions. This planning fallacy is typically studied in the domain of time expenditures; consumers make plans for money expenditures as well, but the literature often conflates money misprediction with time misprediction. In three studies, we find that the planning fallacy is absent or much reduced for money relative to time, using both self-reported tendencies and actual predictions and expenditures. We hypothesize that this cross-resource difference exists because consumers constrain money expenditures more successfully than they constrain time expenditures in order to meet their predictions.


Stephen Spiller and John G. Lynch (2009) ,"Consumers Commit the Planning Fallacy For Time But Not For Money", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36, eds. Ann L. McGill and Sharon Shavitt, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 1040-1041.


Stephen Spiller, Duke University, USA
John G. Lynch, Duke University, USA


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36 | 2009

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


System Justification and the Preference for Atavistic Products

Minju Han, Yale University, USA
George Newman, Yale University, USA

Read More


M9. Exploring Historical Nostalgia and its Relevance to Consumer Research

Matthew Farmer, University of Arizona, USA
Caleb Warren, University of Arizona, USA

Read More


D7. ‘That’s (Not) My Business’: Examining Behavior, Interactions and Implications of Consumer Brand Advocates and Brand Adversaries in Social Media

Marcus Opitz, University of Vienna
Sabine Einwiller, University of Vienna

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.