When Self-Regulation Leads to Overconsumption: the Goal-Progress Illusion

We show that when individuals face an option that represents one of two competing goals (e.g., a tasty but high-calorie steak), adding another option that favors the alternative goal (e.g., a low-calorie salad) will increase the preference for a combined option that represents both goals (steak and salad). Choosing the combined option, however, increases individuals’ calorie intake – an outcome counter to their goal of consuming fewer calories. We explain this pattern of behavior by theorizing that individuals evaluate choice options not only based on their actual performance (e.g., amount of calories) but also based on their fit with the activated goal. We test this proposition in a series of four experiments.


Alexander Chernev and David Gal (2009) ,"When Self-Regulation Leads to Overconsumption: the Goal-Progress Illusion", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36, eds. Ann L. McGill and Sharon Shavitt, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 181-183.


Alexander Chernev, Northwestern University, USA
David Gal, Northwestern University, USA


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36 | 2009

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


Brand Fan(atic)s: When Excessive Brand Loyalty Sends the Wrong Signal

Isabelle Engeler, IESE Business School
Kate Barasz, IESE Business School

Read More


Testing Theories of Goal Progress within Online Learning

Tong Lu, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Eric Bradlow, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Wesley Hutchinson, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More


Secrecy Prompts Nonconformity-Avoidance in Consumption Choice

DONGJIN HE, Hong Kong Polytechic University
Yuwei Jiang, Hong Kong Polytechic University
Gerald J. Gorn, Hong Kong Polytechic University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.