When Self-Regulation Leads to Overconsumption: the Goal-Progress Illusion

We show that when individuals face an option that represents one of two competing goals (e.g., a tasty but high-calorie steak), adding another option that favors the alternative goal (e.g., a low-calorie salad) will increase the preference for a combined option that represents both goals (steak and salad). Choosing the combined option, however, increases individuals’ calorie intake – an outcome counter to their goal of consuming fewer calories. We explain this pattern of behavior by theorizing that individuals evaluate choice options not only based on their actual performance (e.g., amount of calories) but also based on their fit with the activated goal. We test this proposition in a series of four experiments.


Alexander Chernev and David Gal (2009) ,"When Self-Regulation Leads to Overconsumption: the Goal-Progress Illusion", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36, eds. Ann L. McGill and Sharon Shavitt, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 181-183.


Alexander Chernev, Northwestern University, USA
David Gal, Northwestern University, USA


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36 | 2009

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


Inside Out: Product Essence is Perceived to be Concentrated in the Center of a Group of Products

Kunter Gunasti, Washington State University, USA
Noah VanBergen, University of Cincinnati, USA
Caglar Irmak, University of Miami, USA

Read More


When Implementation Intentions Backfire: Illusion of Goal Progress in Financial Decisions

Linda Court Salisbury, Boston College, USA
Gergana Y. Nenkov, Boston College, USA
Min Zhao, Boston College, USA

Read More


How Incremental Theory Enhances or Reduces Charitable Giving

Alyssa Yoon, Korea University, Korea
Jongwon Park, Korea University, Korea

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.