Can Switching Brands Help Your Favorite Team Win the Big Game?
Existing psychology literature suggests that when three pre-requisites are met (priority, consistency, and exclusivity), individuals are likely to perceive the illusion that they can control outside events, such as professional ballgames. This paper demonstrates that individuals regularly deploy superstition as a purchase strategy in response to this illusion of control. Three experiments manipulate these pre-requisites of illusory control, finding that superstitious behavior occurs even as consumers 1) agree that the linkage between their purchasing behavior and the outcome of the event is spurious, and 2) report that the event outcome is unlikely to influence their choice.
Eric Hamerman and Gita Johar (2009) ,"Can Switching Brands Help Your Favorite Team Win the Big Game?", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36, eds. Ann L. McGill and Sharon Shavitt, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 31-35.
Eric Hamerman, Columbia University, USA
Gita Johar, Columbia University, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36 | 2009
The Trusted Influencer: How They Do It and How Brands Can Benefit
Gillian Brooks, Oxford University, UK
Mikolaj Piskorski, IMD
K8. Framing Matters. How Comparisons to Ideal and Anti-Ideal Reference Points Affect Brand Evaluations.
Magdalena Zyta Jablonska, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Andrzej Falkowski, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Psychological Reactions to Human Versus Robotic Job Replacement
Armin Granulo, Technical University of Munich
Christopher Fuchs, Technical University of Munich
Stefano Puntoni, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands