“…Do I Need It, Do I, Do I Really Need This?”: Exploring the Role of Rationalization in Impulse Buying Episodes

The paper complements existing research regarding the interplay between impulsive and deliberative processes in consumer decision making, by examining how cognition (in the form of rationalizations or motivated judgements) enables people to proceed with (rather than control) their impulses. It applies the concept of neutralization (Sykes and Matza, 1957), in the manner of a theory of motivated cognition and as a taxonomy of pre- and post-behavioral rationalizations; and presents findings from a preliminary study which suggests that neutralization theory can be applied to accounts of impulse buying episodes.


Andreas Chatzidakis, Andrew Smith, and Sally A. Hibbert (2009) ,"“…Do I Need It, Do I, Do I Really Need This?”: Exploring the Role of Rationalization in Impulse Buying Episodes", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36, eds. Ann L. McGill and Sharon Shavitt, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 248-253.


Andreas Chatzidakis, Royal Holloway University of London, UK
Andrew Smith, Nottingham University, UK
Sally A. Hibbert, Nottingham University, UK


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36 | 2009

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


A11. When Political Neutrality Backfires

Ike Silver, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Alex Shaw, University of Chicago, USA
Rob Kurzban, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More


Time-of-Day Effects on Consumers’ Social Media Engagement

Ozum Zor, Rutgers University, USA
Kihyun Hannah Kim, Rutgers University, USA
Ashwani Monga, Rutgers University, USA

Read More


E8. Perceptions of Out-Group Members: The Effects of Language Abstraction

Afra Koulaei, University of South-Eastern Norway
Daniela Cristian, City University of London, UK

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.