Choice As an End Versus a Means

We propose that same choice activity is experienced differently depending on how the choice is framed. We draw a distinction between instrumental choices, which are construed as means to serve consumption goals, and experiential choices, which are construed as their own end. We show that instrumental choices undermine psychological resource whereas experiential choices replenish this resource. As a result, although experiential choices are made with no consumption goal in mind, they increase consumption beyond instrumental choices. Four studies find support to these predictions in choice of food items, vacation packages, fiction books, and flower bouquets.



Citation:

Jinhee Choi and Ayelet Fishbach (2009) ,"Choice As an End Versus a Means", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36, eds. Ann L. McGill and Sharon Shavitt, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 172-176.

Authors

Jinhee Choi, University of Chicago, USA
Ayelet Fishbach, University of Chicago, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36 | 2009



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Personal Budgeting: Does It Work?

Christina Kan, Texas A&M University, USA
Philip M. Fernbach, University of Colorado, USA
John Lynch, University of Colorado, USA

Read More

Featured

F12. Matching Green Advertising Strategies and Brand Positioning to Improve Brand Evaluation

Danielle Mantovani, Federal University of Paraná
Victoria Vilasanti, Federal University of Paraná
Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno, HEC Montreal, Canada
Cecilia Souto Maior, Federal University of Paraná

Read More

Featured

Communicating a Promise of Change: Visual Steps Enhance Process Imagery

Luca Cian, University of Virginia, USA
aradhna krishna, University of Michigan, USA
Chiara Longoni, Boston University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.