Choice As an End Versus a Means

We propose that same choice activity is experienced differently depending on how the choice is framed. We draw a distinction between instrumental choices, which are construed as means to serve consumption goals, and experiential choices, which are construed as their own end. We show that instrumental choices undermine psychological resource whereas experiential choices replenish this resource. As a result, although experiential choices are made with no consumption goal in mind, they increase consumption beyond instrumental choices. Four studies find support to these predictions in choice of food items, vacation packages, fiction books, and flower bouquets.


Jinhee Choi and Ayelet Fishbach (2009) ,"Choice As an End Versus a Means", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36, eds. Ann L. McGill and Sharon Shavitt, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 172-176.


Jinhee Choi, University of Chicago, USA
Ayelet Fishbach, University of Chicago, USA


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36 | 2009

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


Approach and Loss Aversion: Consumer Responses to Approaching and Receding Stimuli in Advertising

Lana Mulier, Ghent University, Belgium
Iris Vermeir, Ghent University, Belgium
Hendrik Slabbinck, Ghent University, Belgium

Read More


K4. Movie Reviews and their Sentiments: Evidence of a Bandwagon Effect in Individualistic Cultures

Subimal Chatterjee, SUNY Binghamton, USA
Ning Fu, SUNY Binghamton, USA
Qi Wang, SUNY Binghamton, USA

Read More


If No One Saw It on Instagram, Was It Any Good? Examining Received Attention as a Social Benefit of Experiential Consumption

Matthew J Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Jamie D. Hyodo, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.