Choice As an End Versus a Means

We propose that same choice activity is experienced differently depending on how the choice is framed. We draw a distinction between instrumental choices, which are construed as means to serve consumption goals, and experiential choices, which are construed as their own end. We show that instrumental choices undermine psychological resource whereas experiential choices replenish this resource. As a result, although experiential choices are made with no consumption goal in mind, they increase consumption beyond instrumental choices. Four studies find support to these predictions in choice of food items, vacation packages, fiction books, and flower bouquets.



Citation:

Jinhee Choi and Ayelet Fishbach (2009) ,"Choice As an End Versus a Means", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36, eds. Ann L. McGill and Sharon Shavitt, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 172-176.

Authors

Jinhee Choi, University of Chicago, USA
Ayelet Fishbach, University of Chicago, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36 | 2009



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Market Structure and Firm Engagement in Divisive Political Issues

Chris Hydock, Georgetown University, USA
Neeru Paharia, Georgetown University, USA
Sean Blair, Georgetown University, USA

Read More

Featured

Morality Matters in the Marketplace: The Influence of Morally Based Attitudes on Consumer Purchase Intentions

Andrew Luttrell, Ball State University
Jacob Teeny, Ohio State University, USA
Richard Petty, Ohio State University, USA

Read More

Featured

P6. Marginal Cost Consideration

Ethan Pew, Stony Brook University
Hyunhwan Lee, University of Miami, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.