Pulling-Up Or Pushing Down? Exploring Pro-Leader and Anti-Trailer Processing in Multi-Option Consumer Choices
Tentative preferences that emerge during a binary choice cause consumers to bias their evaluations of new information to favor the currently preferred or leading option. This paper examines what happens to information evaluations when consumers make a choice between more than two options. Specifically, do decision makers evaluate new information to favor the leading option, or do they evaluate new information to disfavor the trailing (i.e., currently least preferred) option(s)? An initial experiment shows that individuals engage both in pro-leader and anti-trailer processing, and that these forms of biased processing increase as the number of options increases.
Simon J. Blanchard, Margaret G. Meloy, and Kurt A. Carlson (2009) ,"Pulling-Up Or Pushing Down? Exploring Pro-Leader and Anti-Trailer Processing in Multi-Option Consumer Choices", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36, eds. Ann L. McGill and Sharon Shavitt, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 957-957.
Simon J. Blanchard, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Margaret G. Meloy, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Kurt A. Carlson, Duke University, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 36 | 2009
D8. Why Employees Communicate Positive eWOM on Social Networking Sites: Motivations and Moderators
Jing Zhang, 华中科技大学管理学院
Ya Zhang, 华中科技大学管理学院
Testing Theories of Goal Progress within Online Learning
Tong Lu, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Eric Bradlow, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Wesley Hutchinson, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Who Gets Credit? Who Gets Blame? The Role of Agency in Ethical Production
Neeru Paharia, Georgetown University, USA