Effects of Articulatory Suppression on Phonetic Symbolism Effects on Brand Name Preference
Recent research suggests that phonetic symbolism—the notion that the sound of a word can convey meaning apart from the word’s actual definition—can influence brand name preference (Lowrey and Shrum 2007). In this study, we show that front and back vowel sounds influence brand name preference, but only when phonetic information is allowed to enter the phonological (memory) store. When phonetic information is allowed to enter the phonological store (by simply having participants read the brand names to themselves), front vowel sounds (which connote attributes such as fast and small) are preferred over back vowel sounds (which connote attributes such as big, powerful) when the product category is a two-seater convertible but the pattern of results is reversed when the product category is an SUV. However, when phonetic information is blocked from entering the phonological store through an articulatory suppression manipulation (counting out loud while reading the brand names), the phonetic symbolism effect is eliminated.
Citation:
L. J. Shrum and Tina M. Lowrey (2008) ,"Effects of Articulatory Suppression on Phonetic Symbolism Effects on Brand Name Preference", in LA - Latin American Advances in Consumer Research Volume 2, eds. Claudia R. Acevedo, Jose Mauro C. Hernandez, and Tina M. Lowrey, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 8--9.
Authors
L. J. Shrum, University of Texas at San Antonio
Tina M. Lowrey, University of Texas at San Antonio
Volume
LA - Latin American Advances in Consumer Research Volume 2 | 2008
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Shared Values, Trust, and Consumers’ Deference to Experts
Samuel Johnson, University of Bath, UK
Max Rodrigues, DePaul University, USA
David Tuckett, University College London
Featured
L7. The Joy of Shopping: Reconciling Mixed Effects of Positive Emotions on Shopping Behavior
Kelley Gullo, Duke University, USA
Duncan Simester, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Gavan Fitzsimons, Duke University, USA
Featured
The Influence of Conflicting and Complementary Benefit Goals on the Execution of Accuracy and Effort Process Goals
Felipe Marinelli Affonso, University of Florida, USA
Chris Janiszewski, University of Florida, USA