Dirt! - an Interpretive Study of Negative Opinions About a Brand Extension
How can researchers and managers understand the notions and feelings behind unfavorable responses to a brand extension? Using a sociocultural perspective on purity and impurity (Douglas 1966), this paper explores the usefulness of thinking about negative opinions in terms of reactions to dirt. The metaphor informs an interpretation of negative comments in an internet discussion forum, on the introduction of a new car model from Porsche. Conceptions of dirt as disturbing and upsetting; risky and dangerous; and immoral and blameworthy, are employed to develop new insights into the intersection between brands, brand extensions, and consumers.
Citation:
Henrik Sjodin (2005) ,"Dirt! - an Interpretive Study of Negative Opinions About a Brand Extension", in E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 7, eds. Karin M. Ekstrom and Helene Brembeck, Goteborg, Sweden : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 92-96.
Authors
Henrik Sjodin, Center for Consumer Marketing, Stockholm School of Economics
Volume
E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 7 | 2005
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
A4. Persuasive Messaging in the Modern Media Landscape: Character Assassinations in Social Network’s Echo Chambers
Niek Althuizen, ESSEC Business School
Sourjo Mukherjee, ESSEC Business School
Negin Latifi Kasani, ESSEC Business School
Featured
Cohesion or Coercion? Why Coordinated Behavior Backfires in Marketing Contexts
Noah VanBergen, University of Cincinnati, USA
Featured
How the Voice Persuades
Alex Van Zant, Rutgers University, USA
Jonah Berger, University of Pennsylvania, USA