The Oprah Effect: Consumers’ Responses to Lucky Vs. Unlucky Leaders When Judging Corporate Crime

After being found guilty of a corporate crime, companies often release information about the CEO indicating that the he has suffered a personal misfortune to garner sympathy, and mitigate consumers’ feelings of dislike. We investigate how consumers use information about the CEO of the company to make purchase decisions. We find that people are more likely to purchase if it is evident that the CEO has suffered some personal misfortune (vs. Control CEO) when the crime is small. However when the crime is egregious, they punish Unlucky CEOs more severely than those who have not suffered a personal misfortune.


Morgan Ward and Julie Irwin (2008) ,"The Oprah Effect: Consumers’ Responses to Lucky Vs. Unlucky Leaders When Judging Corporate Crime", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: .


Morgan Ward, University of Texas, Austin
Julie Irwin, University of Texas, Austin


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


I1. Blaming Him or Them? A Study on Attribution Behavior

Chun Zhang, University of Dayton
Michel Laroche, Concordia University, Canada
Yaoqi Li, Sun Yat-Sen University, China

Read More


Meaningful Numbers: Consumer Response to Verbal Reaffirmation of Numerical Nutrition Information

Steffen Jahn, University of Goettingen, Germany
Monique Breaz, University of Goettingen, Germany
Till Dannewald, Wiesbaden Business School
Yasemin Boztug, University of Goettingen, Germany

Read More


The Messy Satiation Effect: The Benefits of Eating Like a Pig

Kevin L. Sample, University of Georgia, USA
Kelly Haws, Vanderbilt University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.