The Oprah Effect: Consumers’ Responses to Lucky Vs. Unlucky Leaders When Judging Corporate Crime

After being found guilty of a corporate crime, companies often release information about the CEO indicating that the he has suffered a personal misfortune to garner sympathy, and mitigate consumers’ feelings of dislike. We investigate how consumers use information about the CEO of the company to make purchase decisions. We find that people are more likely to purchase if it is evident that the CEO has suffered some personal misfortune (vs. Control CEO) when the crime is small. However when the crime is egregious, they punish Unlucky CEOs more severely than those who have not suffered a personal misfortune.



Citation:

Morgan Ward and Julie Irwin (2008) ,"The Oprah Effect: Consumers’ Responses to Lucky Vs. Unlucky Leaders When Judging Corporate Crime", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: .

Authors

Morgan Ward, University of Texas, Austin
Julie Irwin, University of Texas, Austin



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Can’t Take the Heat? Randomized Field Experiments in Household Electricity Consumption

Praveen Kumar Kopalle, Dartmouth College, USA

Read More

Featured

Brought To You Live”: On The Consumption Experience of Live Social Media Streams

Nofar Duani, New York University, USA
Alixandra Barasch, New York University, USA
Adrian Ward, University of Texas at Austin, USA

Read More

Featured

‘Family Tech-Support’: Consequences for Family Assemblages and Non-Purchase Decision Technology Adoption

Pao Franco, University of Melbourne, Australia

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.