I’M Fair, Therefore I Deceive
We examine conditions under which consumers who are concerned about fairness are more likely to engage in deception than are others. Within an interpersonal selling context, we examine several factors that may affect consumers’ likelihood of deceiving others, including the relationship between the seller and buyer (cooperative vs. competitive), social motivations (prosocial, such as fairness or empathy-related vs. pro-self, such as individualistic or competitive), and type of deception (omission vs. commission). Two studies demonstrate that prosocial individuals tend to be more deceptive with competitive buyer than are individualists. However, there are no differences across various types of social motivations in terms of reaction to a cooperative buyer. Our results show that a fairness motivation may lead to morally conflicting behavior.
Amna Kirmani and Olga Dorokhina (2008) ,"I’M Fair, Therefore I Deceive", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 221-224.
Amna Kirmani, University of Maryland
Olga Dorokhina, University of Maryland
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008
I4. Pink Tax: Are Some Marketing Practices Discriminatory?
Andrea Rochelle Bennett, University of North Texas
Audhesh Paswan, University of North Texas
Kate Goins, University of North Texas
The Subjective Value of Popularity: A Neural Account of Socially Informed Functional Value and Social Value
Robert Goedegebure, Wageningen University, The Netherlands
Irene Tijssen, Wageningen University, The Netherlands
Nynke van der Laan, University of Amsterdam
Hans van Trijp, Wageningen University, The Netherlands
The Impact of Anthropomorphized Cute Brands on Consumer Preferences for Distinctive and Majority-Endorsed Products
Marina Puzakova, Lehigh University
Nevena T Koukova, Lehigh University