Together and Apart: What Makes Choice Alternatives Compete Versus Complement

We examine whether the mental framing of choice alternatives pertaining to goals and temptation (e.g., healthy vs. fatty food) as competing or complementing influences their value and people’ choice. We find that when goal- and temptation-related alternatives are depicted together in a unified choice set (e.g., one image), they seem complementing and therefore people assign greater value to tempting options. Conversely, when these choice alternatives are presented apart from each other, in two choice-sets that are sorted by the underlying goals (e.g., two images), they seem to compete with each other and people assign greater value to goal options.


Ying Zhang and Ayelet Fishbach (2008) ,"Together and Apart: What Makes Choice Alternatives Compete Versus Complement", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 169-172.


Ying Zhang, University of Chicago
Ayelet Fishbach, University of Chicago


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


Running Through Time: How Life Rhythms Foster Identity Permanence

Benjamin Rosenthal, Fundação Getúlio Vargas
Eliane Zamith Brito, Fundação Getúlio Vargas

Read More


When Too much “I” is Bad for “Us”: The Detrimental Effect of Selfie on Self -Brand Connection.

MEHAK BHARTI, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Sharon Ng, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Read More


Both Good from Afar…and Far from Good? Mental Representation Changes Consumer Preference for Products from a Brand with a Reputation for Innovativeness

Jeff Larson, Brigham Young University, USA
Kelly Goldsmith, Vanderbilt University, USA
BJ Allen, University of Arkansas, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.