When Images and Words Don’T Agree, Images Win: the Shielding Effect of Imagination on Attitude Change
This study proposes that imagery-provoking product descriptions, compared to pallid ones (e.g., ratings of a product), lead to attitudes that are more resistant to opposing analytically-presented information. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a study in which participants were presented with two conflicting pieces of information about a product. A significant primacy effect was found when the first evaluation was imagery-provoking and the second analytically-presented but not when both evaluations were presented in an analytical format. This effect appeared to be mediated by the greater amount of cognitive elaboration generated by the imagery-provoking message.
Massimiliano Ostinelli and Ulf Bockenholt (2008) ,"When Images and Words Don’T Agree, Images Win: the Shielding Effect of Imagination on Attitude Change", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 977-978.
Massimiliano Ostinelli, McGill University, Canada
Ulf Bockenholt, McGill University, Canada
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008
E5. Volunteer Motivations for Direct versus Indirect Service
Abigail Schneider, Regis University
Eric Hamerman, Iona College
O1. Choice, Rejection, and Context Effects
Shih-Chieh Chuang, National Chung Cheng University
Yin-Hui Cheng, National Taichung University of Education
Disgusting? No, just different. Understanding consumer skepticism towards sustainable food innovations
Jan Andre Koch, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Koert van Ittersum, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Jan Willem Bolderdijk, University of Groningen, The Netherlands