Can Two Wrongs Make a Right? Accidental Accuracy in Predictions of Others’ Preferences Under Uncertainty

Marketers often must accurately predict consumers’ preferences under uncertainty. We focus on two key steps in such predictions. First, predictors must anticipate others’ beliefs about the likelihood of uncertain events. Second, predictors must anticipate the weight that beliefs will have on others’ choices. We find that predictors typically err at both steps. Intriguingly, the errors they make are of opposing directions and can result in “accidental” accuracy. Consequently, fixing either one of the errors can result in inaccurate predictions. An application of our analysis reveals a specific pattern by which principals diverge from optimal hiring strategies for agents.



Citation:

Katherine Burson, David Faro, and Yuval Rottenstreich (2008) ,"Can Two Wrongs Make a Right? Accidental Accuracy in Predictions of Others’ Preferences Under Uncertainty", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 242-245.

Authors

Katherine Burson, University of Michigan
David Faro, London Business School, UK
Yuval Rottenstreich, New York University



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Consumers' response to branded longevity

Anthony Moussa, Paris School of Business
Virginie de Barnier, IAE AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY

Read More

Featured

How Awe Might Be Awesome: The Role of Awe in Consumers’ Food Consumption and Perceptions of Misshapen Produce

Begum Oz, University of Massachusetts, USA
Elizabeth Miller, University of Massachusetts, USA

Read More

Featured

Semantic Processes in Memory-Based Consumer Decision Making

Sudeep Bhatia, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.