Too Much Fit? How Regulatory Fit Can Turn Us Into Buridan’S Asses

People derive value from fulfilling their goals through means that fit their motivational or regulatory orientation. Such “value from fit” is typically found in studies that pair a regulatory orientation with a single means to achieve the goal. But what happens when there are multiple means to achieve the same goal? In this paper we investigate the consequences of such “too much fit” on people’s choices among multi-attribute stimuli. We show that too much fit arouses acute decision conflict, and evokes decision processes that result in a pronounced tendency to make counter- normative choices. We test our hypotheses using the attraction, compromise, and deferral paradigms.



Citation:

Jonathan Levav, Ran Kivetz, and Cecile Cho (2008) ,"Too Much Fit? How Regulatory Fit Can Turn Us Into Buridan’S Asses", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 122-124.

Authors

Jonathan Levav, Columbia University
Ran Kivetz, Columbia University
Cecile Cho, Columbia University



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

How Incremental Theory Enhances or Reduces Charitable Giving

Alyssa Yoon, Korea University, Korea
Jongwon Park, Korea University, Korea

Read More

Featured

“Eww, It Has a Face!” Anthropomorphizing Food Products Deteriorates Consumption Experience

Roland Schroll, University of Innsbruck, Austria

Read More

Featured

F6. Can CSR Save a Firm From a Crisis? A Role of Gratitude in the Buffering Effect of CSR on Consumer Vindictive Behavior.

Junghyun Kim, NEOMA Business School
Taehoon Park, University of South Carolina, USA
Myungsuh Lim, Sangji University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.