Designing Effective Health Communications: a Meta-Analysis of Experimental Results

What is the optimal design for health communications? A meta-analysis examines three categories of characteristics that affect response, context (e.g., prevention vs. detection), message factors (e.g., framing), and individual differences (e.g., gender). A sample of 85 empirical papers involving nearly 30,000 participants indicates that one important difference is whether message effectiveness is evaluated using attitudes towards recommendations or intentions to follow the recommendations. Overall, results indicate that the format of health messages is critical in shaping attitudes and intentions and that considerable thought needs to go into ensuring that appropriate communication and evaluation approaches are utilized.



Citation:

Punam Anand Keller and Donald R. Lehmann (2008) ,"Designing Effective Health Communications: a Meta-Analysis of Experimental Results", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 117-121.

Authors

Punam Anand Keller, Dartmouth College
Donald R. Lehmann, Columbia University



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Semantic Processes in Memory-Based Consumer Decision Making

Sudeep Bhatia, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Featured

C6. How Does Unsatisfied Curiosity Stir Our Craving For Food?

Chen Wang, Drexel University, USA

Read More

Featured

When Buffers Backfire: Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation and Consumer Response to Corporate Ethical Transgressions

Marlene Vock, Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam
Adrian Ward, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Margaret C. Campbell, University of Colorado, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.