The Bold – Timid Divide in Consumer Choice

We propose that many seemingly different choice problems consumers face involve fundamentally similar options. Specifically, we argue that across a wide range of problems some options represent more “timid” choices (e.g., compromise, safe, and standard options) whereas other options represent more “bold” choices (e.g., extreme, risky, and unique options). The tendency to select a more timid or bold option across problem types is affected by situational cues which trigger a more timid or bold mindset. Several studies demonstrate this distinction between options and the corresponding mindsets, showing that the same manipulations have an equivalent effect on choice behavior across different choice problems.



Citation:

Michal Maimaran and Itamar Simonson (2008) ,"The Bold – Timid Divide in Consumer Choice", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 101-105.

Authors

Michal Maimaran, Stanford University
Itamar Simonson, Stanford University



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Running Through Time: How Life Rhythms Foster Identity Permanence

Benjamin Rosenthal, Fundação Getúlio Vargas
Eliane Zamith Brito, Fundação Getúlio Vargas

Read More

Featured

A Computational Social Science Framework for Visualizing the Possibility Space of Consumer-Object Assemblages from IoT Interaction Data

Donna Hoffman, George Washington University, USA
Thomas Novak, George Washington University, USA

Read More

Featured

R4. Human Brands and Their Consumers: How Consumers Reform Brand Understandings Following Critical Incidents

Kimberley Mosher Preiksaitis, Siena College

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.