The Bold – Timid Divide in Consumer Choice

We propose that many seemingly different choice problems consumers face involve fundamentally similar options. Specifically, we argue that across a wide range of problems some options represent more “timid” choices (e.g., compromise, safe, and standard options) whereas other options represent more “bold” choices (e.g., extreme, risky, and unique options). The tendency to select a more timid or bold option across problem types is affected by situational cues which trigger a more timid or bold mindset. Several studies demonstrate this distinction between options and the corresponding mindsets, showing that the same manipulations have an equivalent effect on choice behavior across different choice problems.



Citation:

Michal Maimaran and Itamar Simonson (2008) ,"The Bold – Timid Divide in Consumer Choice", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 101-105.

Authors

Michal Maimaran, Stanford University
Itamar Simonson, Stanford University



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

The Last Hurrah Effect: End-of-Week and End-of-Month Time Periods Increase Financial Risk-Taking

Xinlong Li, University of Toronto, Canada
Avni Shah, University of Toronto, Canada

Read More

Featured

Less Time, More Procrastination? The Impact of Time Pressure on Task Initiation

Jing Jiang, Renmin University of China
Alisa Yinghao Wu, Columbia University, USA

Read More

Featured

Situation Neglect Underlies Both Psychological Myopia and Psychological Hyperopia

Sarah Wei, University of Warwick
Christopher Hsee, University of Chicago, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.