Low-Balling on Goals to Regulate Future Affect: a Functional Strategy?

This paper questions the lay theory that future affect can be managed by lowering one’s expected performance standard. This strategy can work only if performance is compared to the initially set standard. We argue that performance potential is instead spontaneously evoked at the time of performance feedback and used as the benchmark instead of one’s initial goals. Even when goals are met, this comparison results in lower levels of satisfaction and greater disappointment when goals are set low (vs. high). Such negative impact of “low-balling” on goals persists even when performance outcome is held constant and counterfactual thoughts are prevented.



Citation:

Cecile K. Cho and Gita V. Johar (2008) ,"Low-Balling on Goals to Regulate Future Affect: a Functional Strategy?", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 89-92.

Authors

Cecile K. Cho, Columbia University, USA
Gita V. Johar, Columbia University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

People Overpredict the Benefit of Using Expensive Items and Appearing Rich in Friend-Making

Xilin Li, University of Chicago, USA
Christopher Hsee, University of Chicago, USA

Read More

Featured

The Effects of Subjective Knowledge and Naïve Theory on Consumers’ Inference of Missing Information

Lien-Ti Bei, National Chengchi Uniersity, Taiwan
Li Keng Cheng, National Chengchi Uniersity, Taiwan

Read More

Featured

Believing in and Reacting to Rumors: The Role of Congruity and Nature of Existing Predisposition

Satadruta Mookherjee, SUNY Binghamton, USA
Subimal Chatterjee, SUNY Binghamton, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.