The Learning (And Not) of Effort and Accuracy Tradeoffs

When making decisions, consumers balance their desire for accuracy with their desire to conserve mental effort. This assumption pervades the consumer behavior literature. Despite its ubiquity, no research has examined the manner in which consumers come to learn the optimal balance of effort and accuracy for a given decision. By examining this dynamic process, the current research demonstrates that consumers insufficiently adjust original effort level when explicit changes to the task are made. This bias is significant because it implies that consumers are not as adaptive as previously thought. Three studies demonstrate the bias and show the unique contribution of three causal mechanisms.


Jeffrey S. Larson (2008) ,"The Learning (And Not) of Effort and Accuracy Tradeoffs", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 820-821.


Jeffrey S. Larson, Brigham Young University


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


O10. Individual Differences in Consumers' Need For Cognition and Affect: A Neuromarketing Study Using Voxel-Based Morphometry

Jianping Huang, Tsinghua University
Yang Sun, Tsinghua University
Jie Sui, University of Bath, UK
Xiaoang Wan, Tsinghua University

Read More


Cheating Your Self: Diagnostic Self-Deceptive Cheating for Intrinsic Rewards

Sara Loughran Dommer, Georgia Tech, USA
Nicole Marie Coleman, University of Pittsburgh, USA

Read More


Consumer Perceptions of Environmental ‘Win-Wins’

Tamar Makov, Yale University, USA
George Newman, Yale University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.