Should You Trust Your Feelings in Ultimatum Games?
Five experiments show that, compared to lower trust in one’s feelings, (1) higher trust in one’s feelings results in less generous offers in ultimatum games, (2) especially in the dictator version of the game. Higher trust in one’s feelings also results in (3) greater rejection of unfair offers, but equivalent acceptance of fair offers. The findings do not appear to be driven by differences in perceptions of what players see as “fair” divisions under high versus low trust of feelings. Rather, players with high trust in their feelings appear play the game as if they interpreted it in a more literal fashion. Implications for the relation between emotion and rationality are discussed.
Andrew Stephen and Michel Tuan Pham (2008) ,"Should You Trust Your Feelings in Ultimatum Games?", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 59-62.
Andrew Stephen, Columbia University
Michel Tuan Pham, Columbia University
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008
Trusting the data, the self and “the other” in self tracking practices
Dorthe Brogård Kristensen, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
Approach and Loss Aversion: Consumer Responses to Approaching and Receding Stimuli in Advertising
Lana Mulier, Ghent University, Belgium
Iris Vermeir, Ghent University, Belgium
Hendrik Slabbinck, Ghent University, Belgium
Unobserved Altruism: How Social- And Self-Signaling Motivations Shape Willingness to Donate
Jennifer Savary, University of Arizona, USA
Kelly Goldsmith, Vanderbilt University, USA