How Argument Structure Biases Acceptance of Advertising Claims: Explaining Deviations From Logical Reasoning in Terms of Subjective Probabilities

Arguments in advertising are intended to maximize the acceptance of the product claims being made. The structure of the argument can influence claim acceptance apart from the quality of the substantiating evidence presented. Specifically, arguments having irrelevant but representative conditionals, hierarchically-related claims, multiple data propositions supporting a single claim, and irrelevant qualifications of conditionals trigger systematic deviations from logical reasoning and over-acceptance of the claim. Probability theory is used to contrast the logical relationships among the beliefs corresponding to each argument with the actual integration rule used by message recipients.



Citation:

Charles S. Areni (2008) ,"How Argument Structure Biases Acceptance of Advertising Claims: Explaining Deviations From Logical Reasoning in Terms of Subjective Probabilities", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 353-358.

Authors

Charles S. Areni, University of Sydney, Australia



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

F10. Food Waste: On the Normalization of Structural Violence

Andreas Plank, Privatuniversität Schloss Seeburg

Read More

Featured

Contested and Confused: The Influence of Social Others in Disrupting Body Projects

Aphrodite Vlahos, University of Melbourne, Australia
Marcus Phipps, University of Melbourne, Australia

Read More

Featured

All We Need is Love: Examining Differences in Time and Money Donations between Dyads and Individuals

Hristina Nikolova, Boston College, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.