Choice With Inference Is Different From Choice Without Inference

In three studies it is shown that encouraging consumers to make explicit inferences about missing attributes leads to significantly different choices compared to choices made without being asked to make inferences. Being prompted to make explicit inferences reduced the tendency to draw on the availability (absence) of an important attribute as a reason for (not) choosing an option; decreased indecisiveness (not choosing any options); increased the attractiveness of chosen options and reduced the perceived difficulty of choices. The inferences made for different attributes of different brands were all interrelated suggesting a more complex inference making process in multi-attribute multi-product choice sets.


Kunter Gunasti and William T. Ross, Jr. (2008) ,"Choice With Inference Is Different From Choice Without Inference", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 814-815.


Kunter Gunasti, Pennsylvania State University
William T. Ross, Jr., Pennsylvania State University


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


Decreasing Impatience with Bundled Donations

Sachin Banker, University of Utah, USA

Read More


From a Culinary Phantasm to an Eudaimonic Well-Being : Exploring The Experience of Amateur Cooking Classes

Virginie Brégeon de Saint-Quentin, Ferrandi Paris, the french school of gastronomy
Ophélie Mugel, Chaire SDSC AgroParisTech, Université Paris Est

Read More


When Waste Costs: The Influence of Price on Consumers’ Perceived Waste and Purchase Intention of an Excessive Amount of Product

Tao Tao, Hong Kong Baptist University
Robert Wyer Jr., University of Cincinnati, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.