Making Choices Depletes the Self's Resources and Impairs Subsequent Self-Regulation
The choices consumers make have become abundant and complex. Although having choices is beneficial, evidence suggests that there are costs to making choices. The current research provides an explanation for these costs by hypothesizing that choice depletes the self’s executive function. We hypothesized that making choices depletes the resource that powers executive functioning, which causes poor performance on subsequent self-regulation tasks, as shown in the lab (Experiment 1) and a field test (Experiment 2). Experiments 3 and 4 separated choice’s effects from other possible contributors and showed that enjoyment partially moderates the extent of depletion caused by making choices.
Citation:
Noelle Nelson and Kathleen Vohs (2008) ,"Making Choices Depletes the Self's Resources and Impairs Subsequent Self-Regulation", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 905-906.
Authors
Noelle Nelson, University of Minnesota
Kathleen Vohs, University of Minnesota
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Teaching Consumer Resistance in Jamaica: Subvertising in Action
Michelle Renee Nelson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Yanyun (Mia) Wang, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Kathy Tian, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Gail Ferguson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Rachel Powell, CDC Foundation
Candace Wray, University of West Indies
Featured
The Best of Both Worlds: Androgyny in Consumer Choice
Niusha Jones, University of North Texas
Blair Kidwell, University of North Texas
Featured
Deprivation of Control and the Phonetic Appeal of Brand Names
Jamel Khenfer, Zayed University
Caroline Cuny, Grenoble Ecole de Management