Making Choices Depletes the Self's Resources and Impairs Subsequent Self-Regulation

The choices consumers make have become abundant and complex. Although having choices is beneficial, evidence suggests that there are costs to making choices. The current research provides an explanation for these costs by hypothesizing that choice depletes the self’s executive function. We hypothesized that making choices depletes the resource that powers executive functioning, which causes poor performance on subsequent self-regulation tasks, as shown in the lab (Experiment 1) and a field test (Experiment 2). Experiments 3 and 4 separated choice’s effects from other possible contributors and showed that enjoyment partially moderates the extent of depletion caused by making choices.



Citation:

Noelle Nelson and Kathleen Vohs (2008) ,"Making Choices Depletes the Self's Resources and Impairs Subsequent Self-Regulation", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 905-906.

Authors

Noelle Nelson, University of Minnesota
Kathleen Vohs, University of Minnesota



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35 | 2008



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

When the Ends Do Not Justify Paying for the Means: Consumers Prefer Shifting Costs from Means to Goals

Franklin Shaddy, University of Chicago, USA
Ayelet Fishbach, University of Chicago, USA

Read More

Featured

The Inimical Lure of Intense Means

Jordan Etkin, Duke University, USA
Szu-chi Huang, Stanford University, USA

Read More

Featured

Effects of Brand Knowledge, Motivations, and Trust on Consumption Experience among Millennial Consumers

Ananya Rajagopal, Tecnológico de Monterrey, MEXICO

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.