It Seems Factual, But Is It? Effects of Using Sharp Versus Round Numbers in Advertising Claims
It Seems Factual, But Is It?
Effects of Using Sharp versus Round Numbers in Advertising Claims
Robert M. Schindler, Rutgers University-Camden
Richard F. Yalch, University of Washington-Seattle
This paper compares sharp versus round numbers in advertising claims. Round numbers have a salient conceptual basis (e.g., 10 years are a decade). Sharp numbers do not (e.g., 7 years). Estimates tend to be expressed with round numbers. An experiment is described that examines whether consumers make the false assumption that claims using sharp numbers are less likely to be estimates (i.e., are more factual) than those using round numbers and, if so, whether this makes sharp-number claims more believable. The results demonstrate that such assumptions do occur, particularly for those consumers considered to be advertising skeptics.
Robert Schindler and Richard Yalch (2006) ,"It Seems Factual, But Is It? Effects of Using Sharp Versus Round Numbers in Advertising Claims", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 33, eds. Connie Pechmann and Linda Price, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 586-590.
Robert Schindler, Rutgers University, Camden
Richard Yalch, University of Washington, Seattle
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 33 | 2006
Featured papersSee More
E4. Doing Good for Nothing: Motive Inferences from the Probabilistic Profits of Prosociality
Ike Silver, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Jackie Silverman, University of Pennsylvania, USA
P13. Self-Selected versus Fixed Price Bundling: The Effect of Bundle Type on Perceived Quality
Burcak Bas, Bocconi University, Italy
GULEN SARIAL ABI, Bocconi University, Italy
Predicting Consumer Brand Recall and Choice Using Large-Scale Text Corpora
Zhihao Zhang, University of California Berkeley, USA
Aniruddha Nrusimha, University of California Berkeley, USA
Ming Hsu, University of California Berkeley, USA