It Seems Factual, But Is It? Effects of Using Sharp Versus Round Numbers in Advertising Claims
It Seems Factual, But Is It?
Effects of Using Sharp versus Round Numbers in Advertising Claims
Robert M. Schindler, Rutgers University-Camden
Richard F. Yalch, University of Washington-Seattle
This paper compares sharp versus round numbers in advertising claims. Round numbers have a salient conceptual basis (e.g., 10 years are a decade). Sharp numbers do not (e.g., 7 years). Estimates tend to be expressed with round numbers. An experiment is described that examines whether consumers make the false assumption that claims using sharp numbers are less likely to be estimates (i.e., are more factual) than those using round numbers and, if so, whether this makes sharp-number claims more believable. The results demonstrate that such assumptions do occur, particularly for those consumers considered to be advertising skeptics.
Robert Schindler and Richard Yalch (2006) ,"It Seems Factual, But Is It? Effects of Using Sharp Versus Round Numbers in Advertising Claims", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 33, eds. Connie Pechmann and Linda Price, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 586-590.
Robert Schindler, Rutgers University, Camden
Richard Yalch, University of Washington, Seattle
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 33 | 2006
‘But Screw the Little People, Right?’ Case of the Commercialization of Reward-Based Crowdfunding
Natalia Drozdova, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Norway
J13. The Good and Bad of a Delayed Indulgence: Effects on Self-Perceptions and Purchase Satisfaction
Argiro Kliamenakis, Concordia University, Canada
Kamila Sobol, Concordia University, Canada
Penny for Your Preferences: Leveraging Self-Expression to Increase Prosocial Giving
Jacqueline R. Rifkin, Duke University, USA
Katherine Crain, Duke University, USA
Jonah Berger, University of Pennsylvania, USA